Name: US, UK Governments Commit to Libyan War Despite Citizen Opposition - Shadowproof
Brand: shadowproof.com
SKU: shadowproof-com-11892
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

US, UK Governments Commit to Libyan War Despite Citizen Opposition - Shadowproof

preview

Another $1 million Tomahawk missile being fired from the USS Stout toward Libya on March 19. (US Navy photo)While debate in the US drones on about whether Barack Obama needed , there seems to be little doubt that Congress would have approved the attacks, which cost the US over . Taking this action puts the US government directly at odds with its citizens, who before any “austerity” measures begin to cut Social Security or Medicare. Similarly, a new poll finds that , while . Why do the US and UK governments push for war while ignoring the peaceful desires of their citizens?It is admirable on some fronts that both far left and far right politicians have pointed out that Congressional approval is required before military action is initiated. As the :Some Democratic lawmakers — including Representatives Jerrold Nadler of New York, Barbara Lee of California and Michael E. Capuano of Massachusetts — complained in a House Democratic Caucus conference call as the bombing began that Mr. Obama had exceeded his constitutional authority by authorizing the attack without Congressional permission.That sentiment was echoed by several Republican lawmakers — including Senators Richard G. Lugar of Indiana and Rand Paul of Kentucky and Representative Roscoe G. Bartlett of Maryland — as well as in editorials and columns published over the weekend and on Monday in conservative opinion outlets like the Washington Times editorial page and National Review.Sadly, though, this small number of elected officials who are calling for Constitutional requirements to be followed would be vastly outnumbered should the question actually be brought to a vote. A huge majority of US lawmakers would quickly rush to put their names on the record as authorizing these attacks, just as they did in the ill-fated attack on Iraq, where the AUMF passed by votes of and. Correction, those were the Afghanistan AUMF votes, Iraq was marginally closer, and [h/t Rebecca Griffin for catching the error]. Even when the citizens do not want war, US elected representatives vote overwhelmingly in its favor.One only needs to go back less than two weeks to find the latest poll in which :A majority of Americans prefer cutting defense spending to reduce the federal deficit rather than taking money from public retirement and health programs, a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday showed.The poll found 51 percent of Americans support reducing defense spending, and only 28 percent want to cut Medicare and Medicaid health programs for the elderly and poor. A mere 18 percent back cuts in the Social Security retirement program.Yet, with a majority of Americans wanting to cut the Defense budget, President Obama unilaterally decided to engage the country in another war, blowing over $100 million on missiles in the first day alone. From the conservative :With U.N. coalition forces bombarding Libyan leader Muammar el-Qaddafi from the sea and air, the United States’ part in the operation could ultimately hit several billion dollars — and require the Pentagon to request emergency funding from Congress to pay for it.The first day of Operation Odyssey Dawn had a price tag that was well over $100 million for the U.S. in missiles alone. And the U.S. military, which remains in the lead now in its third day, has pumped millions more into air- and sea-launched strikes targeting air-defense sites and ground-force positions along Libya’s coastline.The politicians in Washington blather about the need to cut Social Security and to remove all federal funding from NPR, while also complaining that they didn’t get to vote in favor of spending another few billions of dollars the US doesn’t have in a war that does not directly affect US security unless that security is defined only by access to oil at low prices.It is no better in the UK. Politicians there did get the opportunity to :The debate focused on Resolution 1973, passed by the United Nations Security Council last week. This authorises “all necessary measures”, short of bringing in an occupying force, to protect Libyan citizens from the Gaddafi regime, which has been fighting rebel forces.The Commons motion – which was backed by 557 MPs and opposed by 13 – followed a second night of US-led action in Libya, with Col Gaddafi’s sprawling Bab al-Aziziya complex in Tripoli among the locations hit.And yet, :Only one in three Britons agree with the decision to take military action in Libya, a poll published Monday showed.The ComRes/ITN poll found that 43 percent disagreed with the action and 22 percent were unsure. Just under half of those surveyed felt military action was an unnecessary risk for Britain to take.Haunted by the experience of the recent Iraq war and continued losses in Afghanistan, Britons told Reuters they were wary of getting dragged into another lengthy foreign conflict at a time of belt-tightening at home.When it comes to war, politicians in the US and UK hear only the call to war, not their citizens’ call to avoid war and cut defense spending to decrease deficits.Shadowproof is a financially independent news organization. All of our funding comes from small donations made by readers like you.We use your donations to hire freelance writers and cover our operating costs. Monthly membership subscriptions give us the stability we need to make plans while ensuring our organization does not depend on grants or major funders. If you like what you read, support our writers with a donation today.&nbsp;

Another $1 million Tomahawk missile being fired from the USS Stout toward Libya on March 19. (US Navy photo)While debate in the US drones on about whether Barack Obama needed , there seems to be little doubt that Congress would have approved the attacks, which cost the US over . Taking this action puts the US government directly at odds with its citizens, who before any “austerity” measures begin to cut Social Security or Medicare. Similarly, a new poll finds that , while . Why do the US and UK governments push for war while ignoring the peaceful desires of their citizens?It is admirable on...

public

Jim White

Reader-supported journalism dedicated to exposing abuses of power in business and government. Founded by @kgosztola & @bsonenstein.

US, UK Governments Commit to Libyan War Despite Citizen Opposition - Shadowproof

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS