TECHWORLD
Bitcoin’s Ultimate Price Floor Could Soon Be Destroyed
TECHWORLD

Bitcoin’s Ultimate Price Floor Could Soon Be Destroyed

Published: November 27, 2019  |  3 min read, 645 words
WRITTEN BY
Your review will affect the following:
Bitcoin and cryptocurrency prices have swung wildly over the last few months following a huge rally in the first half of the year. The bitcoin price has somewhat recovered from a disastrous bear market in 2018 which saw bitcoin touch lows of a little over $3,000—thought to be just under the price of creating (or mining) new bitcoin and making energy-intensive mining operations unsustainable. Now, a group of researchers have come up with what they claim is a cheaper and more energy efficient way to mine bitcoin that could mean the previous bitcoin price floor moves far lower. Bitcoin are... READ MORE
CRITIC
forbes.com
Outlet Rating
forbes.com
img-trusted
88%
Critic Reviews: 1
USER
Billy Bambrough
Author Rating
Billy Bambrough
img-contested
33%
User Reviews: 1
TOP REVIEWS
Surface Level1
Balanced1

CRITIC REVIEWS

Balanced
November 27, 2019
Balanced
A nominally interesting read cataloging another new wrinkle in the ongoing saga which is the alternative currency industry. Relatively balanced, with good quoting and commentary from credible sources. The Author remains on the whole, agnostic, merely laying out the case. However, the piece ultimately does read as a tad more favorable towards the new research being referenced. A worthwhile read, particularly for those following the goings-on in this market.
Is this helpful?

PUBLIC REVIEWS

Surface Level
May 6, 2020
Surface Level
Reads like a press release for HeavyHash. Article makes bold claims of increased efficiency in bitcoin mining but doesn't back it up with anything other than the word of those involved, makes no attempt to validate or provide counterpoint to the claims promoted here. While on the surface it may seem that reducing the electricity cost of proof-of-work may increase mining efficiency, there is a world of security concerns not acknowledged here that requires much more robust analysis than just a press release of HeavyHash talking points.
Is this helpful?